Categorized | Autism

Are We Heading For "Peak Autism"?


Inspired by this recent paper, I decided to look into the history of autism research in terms of the number of papers published per year.

I knew I’d see a recent rise in publications – but it was a lot bigger than I’d expected.

Here’s autism alongside two comparison disorders, ADHD and Down’s:

Here’s a graph of relative growth, showing the number of PubMed hits per year, divided by the hits in 2000 for each disorder (with two more comparisons)

Autism has grown by a whopping factor of x8, in just 12 years.

We are now just two thirds of the way through 2013 but there have been more papers about autism published this year than in the whole of 2011 (as pointed out by Michelle Dawson).

Such expansion can’t continue forever. Autism research must either to reach a plateau, a gradual rate of increase more in line with the growth of science as a whole  (4% per year) – or it will decline.

Does all of this 21st century autism boom reflect healthy growth that will be sustained? Or has it become a ‘bubble’, success driven by success – a ‘bandwagon’ onto which researchers are attracted by the fact that it is going impressively fast?

This issue is perhaps not unrelated to the question of whether diagnosed rates of autism are rising because the disorder is getting more common, or because of cultural changes in diagnostic practice.

Autism diagnoses are rising and so are autism publications. Will they peak? There’s no sign of it… yet.


submit to reddit

  • I don’t think we’ve peaked yet.

    So far, most research for school age children has focused on behavioral and emotional regulation, and teaching social skills, and none have been conducted on a large scale.

    Very little has focused on educational strategies for these children. My doctoral research is focusing on technology interventions for students with Aspergers and High Functioning autism. We know many pieces of the puzzle (enlarged amygdala and hippocampus, visual learning style, etc), but putting it all together to give the student with autism a learning environment in which they will thrive has not happened yet.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iacpStNrXmc

    Uh, I hate to break it to you but Bruno already covered this, in depth, *years* ago.

    • Looks like I’m standing on the flamboyant shoulders of giants.

  • I wrote about inequalities in levels of research on different disorders a couple of years ago http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0015112
    The number of publications tracks closely the level of research funding.
    Conditions that are of similar frequency and severity have very different research investments – part of the reason is lobbying by interest groups but there are other possible explanations too.

  • I seriously think that current diagnostic practices are the problem. For example, see this: http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/01/opinion/la-oe-frances1-2010mar01

  • Papers are rising because no autism as defined in the diagnostic manuals and can be tested for accurately exists. So anyone with autistic symptoms gets enrolled in the merrygoround whether they have real autism (the neurological condition based on fetal white matter variations) or not. Better scrap the whole thing, start fresh with the neurological condition as main marker. No altered CC conforming to a autistic pattern, no autism. That way you can dump 3/4 of papers published.

Article source: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/09/04/are-we-heading-for-peak-autism/